[OCX-87] Feat/Export #2569

gjeanmart · 2025-07-09T11:47:33Z

Make sure these boxes are checked! 📦✅

You ran ./run_tests.sh
You ran pre-commit run -a
If you want to add your network to setup_service.py, provide a link to your
safe-deployments PR and check network name
exists in safe-eth-py

What was wrong? 👾

How was it fixed? 🎯

Summary

This PR introduces a new export endpoint that allows users to retrieve a comprehensive transaction history for Safe wallets in a unified format. The endpoint aggregates all transaction types (multisig, module, and standalone transfers) and provides detailed information about each transaction including token transfers.

What This PR Does

✅ Adds /api/v2/safes/{address}/export/ endpoint
✅ Implements comprehensive transaction aggregation across multiple transaction types
✅ Supports ERC20, ERC721, and native ETH transfers
✅ Provides structured export data with transaction metadata
✅ Includes deduplication logic to prevent duplicate entries
✅ Adds proper serialization and validation

Why This Change Is Needed

Users need a single endpoint to export their complete Safe transaction history for:

Financial reporting and accounting
Transaction auditing and compliance
Data backup and analysis
Integration with external tools

Previously, users had to make multiple API calls to different endpoints to get complete transaction data, making it difficult to get a unified view of their Safe's activity.

Implementation Details

New SQL Query Features

Comprehensive Coverage: Aggregates multisig transactions, module transactions, ERC20 transfers, ERC721 transfers, and internal ETH transfers
Unified Format: Standardizes data structure across all transaction types for consistent consumption

API Design

Endpoint: GET /api/v2/safes/{address}/export/
Pagination: Supports standard pagination parameters
Filtering: Includes transaction type categorization
Format: Returns structured JSON with comprehensive transaction metadata

Data Structure

Each export record includes:

Transaction type classification
Asset information (address, symbol, decimals)
Transaction participants (from, to, proposer, executor)
Execution status and timestamps
Transaction hashes and references

Files Changed

safe_transaction_service/history/views_v2.py - New export endpoint
safe_transaction_service/history/serializers.py - Export serializer
safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py - Export service logic
safe_transaction_service/history/urls_v2.py - URL routing
safe_transaction_service/history/tests/test_views_v2.py - Test coverage

Testing

✅ Unit tests for export serializer
✅ Integration tests for export endpoint
✅ SQL query validation and deduplication testing
✅ Edge case handling (empty results, invalid addresses)

How to Test

# Test the export endpoint
curl -X GET "http://localhost:8000/api/v2/safes/0x84443f61efc60d10da9f9a2398980cd5748394bb/export/"

# Test with pagination
curl -X GET "http://localhost:8000/api/v2/safes/0x84443f61efc60d10da9f9a2398980cd5748394bb/export/?limit=100&offset=0"

Technical Notes

The SQL query handles complex JOINs across multiple tables while maintaining performance
Deduplication ensures no transaction appears multiple times even when it involves multiple transfer types
Error handling includes proper validation for malformed Safe addresses
Response format is consistent with existing API patterns

Breaking Changes

None - this is a new endpoint addition.

Migration Required

None - no database schema changes.

- Add new export endpoint in `views_v2.py` to export Safe transaction history - Implement comprehensive SQL query to aggregate multisig transactions, module transactions, and token transfers - Create `TransactionExportSerializer` for structured export data format - Add transaction export service in transaction_service.py with deduplication logic - Include support for ERC20, ERC721, and native ETH transfers - Add URL routing for `/api/v2/safes/{address}/export/` endpoint - Add comprehensive test coverage for export functionality

Uxio0 · 2025-07-10T13:13:08Z

safe_transaction_service/history/views_v2.py

+        parsed_execution_date_gte = None
+        parsed_execution_date_lte = None
+
+        if execution_date_gte:


Maybe you can use django.utils.dateparse.parse_datetime?

I wrote a serializer to parse this values. ae8a43e

Uxio0 · 2025-07-10T13:13:31Z

safe_transaction_service/history/views_v2.py

+                    },
+                )
+
+        if execution_date_lte:


Same as above. #2569 (comment)

Uxio0 · 2025-07-10T13:15:07Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+        params = []
+
+        if execution_date_gte:
+            where_conditions.append("execution_date >= %s")


Maybe you should assert that execution_date_gte is really a datetime, as it can lead to sql injection if called with a string from other part of the code

Uxio0 · 2025-07-10T13:16:59Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+        where_clause = " AND ".join(where_conditions) if where_conditions else "1=1"
+
+        # Main query that unions all transaction types with their transfers
+        main_query = f"""


Based on our experience with all-transactions endpoint, this query will be really slow to the point it will not end for some big Safes. The relevant txs table needs to be used to filter, and then join the required tables to get the information (take a look at the all-transactions endpoint)

The query needs to be tested in our staging database

Completely agree with you..
As I added tests would be easier try new approach of this query, for now I would say leave as is, anyway I did some performance improvements as remove unnecessary JOINS in some queries.
@Uxio0 I think the count should be exactly the same than count the erc20, erc721 and the intenal transactions, maybe would be simpler than the current approach, what do you think?

Makes sense, yes

Uxio0 · 2025-07-10T13:19:33Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+                # Add '0x' prefix to hex strings and convert addresses to checksum format (except for null values)
+                if row_dict["safe_address"]:
+                    address = "0x" + row_dict["safe_address"]
+                    row_dict["safe_address"] = Web3.to_checksum_address(address)


Web3.to_checksum_address is really slow, better use safe_eth.eth.utils.fast_to_checksum_address

Add tests for moduletransactions sending ether

moisses89 · 2025-07-17T08:42:09Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+                )
+            ) combined
+        )
+        SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT (execution_date, transaction_hash))


@Uxio0 @gjeanmart I think this could give as inconsistent count, same transaction hash in the same date could contains several ERC20 transfers, would makes sense use trace_address and log_index to differenciate it.

Agree, well spotted

moisses89 · 2025-07-17T09:35:10Z

safe_transaction_service/history/views_v2.py

-            try:
-                # Handle different ISO format variations
-                date_str = execution_date_gte.replace("Z", "+00:00")
-                # Fix format issue where timezone offset has space instead of +


Time zone offset is necessary on ISO 8601 format. https://docs.digi.com/resources/documentation/digidocs/90001488-13/reference/r_iso_8601_date_format.htm
Basically the + symbol was omitted because the url was not encoded correctly in the request to scape the "+".
ae8a43e#diff-24713fcb3b2d8297aa5713f19f963ed46b80f4ee025980b00a375d7d59e083dcR2688

moisses89 · 2025-07-17T10:27:57Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+            _trace_address=F("trace_address"),
+        ).values("transaction_hash", "_log_index", "_trace_address")
+
+        total_count = (


The previous count was not working well returning more or less items than the real count, so just counting the transfers would be enough.
Regarding performance analyze this is the result of the new query:

QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Append (cost=0.12..32.85 rows=3 width=96) (actual time=0.015..0.016 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using history_internal_transfer_from on history_internaltx (cost=0.12..8.15 rows=1 width=580) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone) Filter: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) OR (_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea)) -> Subquery Scan on "*SELECT* 2" (cost=8.32..12.35 rows=1 width=96) (actual time=0.009..0.010 rows=0 loops=1) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on history_erc20transfer (cost=8.32..12.33 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=0 loops=1) Recheck Cond: ((("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) OR ((_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with t ime zone))) -> BitmapOr (cost=8.32..8.32 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.008..0.009 rows=0 loops=1) -> Bitmap Index Scan on history_erc_to_f32154_idx (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on history_erc__from_64986c_idx (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: ((_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) -> Subquery Scan on "*SELECT* 3" (cost=8.32..12.35 rows=1 width=96) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=1) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on history_erc721transfer (cost=8.32..12.33 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=1) Recheck Cond: ((("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) OR ((_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with t ime zone))) -> BitmapOr (cost=8.32..8.32 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.001..0.002 rows=0 loops=1) -> Bitmap Index Scan on history_erc_to_02d4ab_idx (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on history_erc__from_72fb41_idx (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: ((_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) AND ("timestamp" >= '2025-07-18 09:58:33.305547+00'::timestamp with time zone)) Planning Time: 3.412 ms Execution Time: 0.068 ms

Just for comparation, this is the previous query plan.

QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Append (cost=0.58..153.86 rows=12 width=40) (actual time=0.088..0.093 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.58..13.40 rows=2 width=41) (actual time=0.019..0.020 rows=0 loops=1) Join Filter: (mt.ethereum_tx_id = erc20.ethereum_tx_id) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.44..12.89 rows=1 width=73) (actual time=0.018..0.019 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..12.42 rows=1 width=69) (actual time=0.018..0.019 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using history_multisigtransaction_safe_ba8bae68 on history_multisigtransaction mt (cost=0.14..4.16 rows=1 width=33) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (safe = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumtx_pkey on history_ethereumtx et (cost=0.14..8.16 rows=1 width=36) (never executed) Index Cond: (tx_hash = mt.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumblock_pkey on history_ethereumblock eb (cost=0.15..0.46 rows=1 width=12) (never executed) Index Cond: (number = et.block_id) -> Index Only Scan using unique_erc20_transfer_index on history_erc20transfer erc20 (cost=0.15..0.48 rows=2 width=32) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = et.tx_hash) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Nested Loop (cost=0.58..13.37 rows=2 width=41) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=1) Join Filter: (mt_1.ethereum_tx_id = erc721.ethereum_tx_id) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.44..12.89 rows=1 width=73) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..12.42 rows=1 width=69) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using history_multisigtransaction_safe_ba8bae68 on history_multisigtransaction mt_1 (cost=0.14..4.16 rows=1 width=33) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (safe = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumtx_pkey on history_ethereumtx et_1 (cost=0.14..8.16 rows=1 width=36) (never executed) Index Cond: (tx_hash = mt_1.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumblock_pkey on history_ethereumblock eb_1 (cost=0.15..0.46 rows=1 width=12) (never executed) Index Cond: (number = et_1.block_id) -> Index Only Scan using unique_erc721_transfer_index on history_erc721transfer erc721 (cost=0.15..0.46 rows=2 width=32) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = et_1.tx_hash) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=0.73..13.70 rows=1 width=41) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=0.58..13.26 rows=1 width=73) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.44..12.80 rows=1 width=73) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using history_multisigtransaction_safe_ba8bae68 on history_multisigtransaction mt_2 (cost=0.14..4.16 rows=1 width=33) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (safe = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.29..8.63 rows=1 width=40) (never executed) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumtx_pkey on history_ethereumtx et_2 (cost=0.14..8.16 rows=1 width=36) (never executed) Index Cond: (tx_hash = mt_2.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Scan using history_ethereumblock_pkey on history_ethereumblock eb_2 (cost=0.15..0.46 rows=1 width=12) (never executed) Index Cond: (number = et_2.block_id) -> Index Only Scan using unique_erc20_transfer_index on history_erc20transfer erc20_1 (cost=0.15..0.48 rows=2 width=32) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = et_2.tx_hash) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Index Only Scan using unique_erc721_transfer_index on history_erc721transfer erc721_1 (cost=0.15..0.46 rows=2 width=32) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = et_2.tx_hash) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Hash Join (cost=9.53..20.16 rows=2 width=40) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Hash Cond: (itx.id = modtx.internal_tx_id) -> Seq Scan on history_internaltx itx (cost=0.00..10.50 rows=50 width=48) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=1) -> Hash (cost=9.50..9.50 rows=2 width=8) (never executed) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on history_moduletransaction modtx (cost=4.16..9.50 rows=2 width=8) (never executed) Recheck Cond: (safe = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) -> Bitmap Index Scan on history_moduletransaction_safe (cost=0.00..4.16 rows=2 width=0) (never executed) Index Cond: (safe = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=15.74..34.43 rows=2 width=40) (actual time=0.020..0.021 rows=0 loops=1) -> Hash Right Anti Join (cost=15.45..22.37 rows=3 width=40) (actual time=0.020..0.021 rows=0 loops=1) Hash Cond: (mt_3.ethereum_tx_id = erc20_2.ethereum_tx_id) -> Seq Scan on history_multisigtransaction mt_3 (cost=0.00..6.39 rows=139 width=33) (never executed) -> Hash (cost=15.40..15.40 rows=4 width=40) (actual time=0.007..0.007 rows=0 loops=1) Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 8kB -> Seq Scan on history_erc20transfer erc20_2 (cost=0.00..15.40 rows=4 width=40) (actual time=0.007..0.007 rows=0 loops=1) Filter: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) OR (_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea)) Rows Removed by Filter: 4 -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..6.21 rows=7 width=32) (never executed) -> Index Scan using unique_internal_tx_trace_address on history_internaltx itx_1 (cost=0.14..5.16 rows=1 width=40) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = erc20_2.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Only Scan using history_moduletransaction_pkey on history_moduletransaction modtx_1 (cost=0.15..1.05 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (internal_tx_id = itx_1.id) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=15.74..34.43 rows=2 width=40) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=0 loops=1) -> Hash Right Anti Join (cost=15.45..22.37 rows=3 width=40) (actual time=0.012..0.013 rows=0 loops=1) Hash Cond: (mt_4.ethereum_tx_id = erc721_2.ethereum_tx_id) -> Seq Scan on history_multisigtransaction mt_4 (cost=0.00..6.39 rows=139 width=33) (never executed) -> Hash (cost=15.40..15.40 rows=4 width=40) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1) Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 8kB -> Seq Scan on history_erc721transfer erc721_2 (cost=0.00..15.40 rows=4 width=40) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1) Filter: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) OR (_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea)) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..6.21 rows=7 width=32) (never executed) -> Index Scan using unique_internal_tx_trace_address on history_internaltx itx_2 (cost=0.14..5.16 rows=1 width=40) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = erc721_2.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Only Scan using history_moduletransaction_pkey on history_moduletransaction modtx_2 (cost=0.15..1.05 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (internal_tx_id = itx_2.id) Heap Fetches: 0 -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=8.44..24.30 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=0 loops=1) -> Hash Right Anti Join (cost=8.16..15.08 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=0 loops=1) Hash Cond: (mt_5.ethereum_tx_id = itx_3.ethereum_tx_id) -> Seq Scan on history_multisigtransaction mt_5 (cost=0.00..6.39 rows=139 width=33) (never executed) -> Hash (cost=8.14..8.14 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 8kB -> Index Scan using history_internal_transfer_from on history_internaltx itx_3 (cost=0.12..8.14 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Filter: (("to" = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea) OR (_from = '\x4b1c677b856d27d7a2cbefdda993fc7e6f83c502'::bytea)) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.29..9.21 rows=7 width=32) (never executed) -> Index Scan using unique_internal_tx_trace_address on history_internaltx itx2 (cost=0.14..8.16 rows=1 width=40) (never executed) Index Cond: (ethereum_tx_id = itx_3.ethereum_tx_id) -> Index Only Scan using history_moduletransaction_pkey on history_moduletransaction modtx_3 (cost=0.15..1.05 rows=1 width=8) (never executed) Index Cond: (internal_tx_id = itx2.id) Heap Fetches: 0 Planning Time: 6.984 ms Execution Time: 0.455 ms

safe_transaction_service/history/serializers.py

falvaradorodriguez · 2025-07-17T11:50:18Z

safe_transaction_service/history/serializers.py

+    safeTxHash = Sha3HashField(source="safe_tx_hash", allow_null=True)
+    method = serializers.CharField(allow_null=True)
+    contractAddress = EthereumAddressField(source="contract_address", allow_null=True)
+    isExecuted = serializers.BooleanField(source="is_executed")


Would it always be true?

falvaradorodriguez · 2025-07-17T11:54:27Z

safe_transaction_service/history/urls_v2.py

    ),
+    path(
+        "safes/<str:address>/export/",
+        views_v2.SafeExportView.as_view(),


Just to be stay aligned, should it go in V1 or V2?

So far we only have in v2, endpoints that were replaced from v1

falvaradorodriguez · 2025-07-17T12:00:44Z

safe_transaction_service/history/services/transaction_service.py

+        where_clause = " AND ".join(where_conditions) if where_conditions else "1=1"
+
+        # Main query that unions all transaction types with their transfers
+        main_query = f"""


I find it strange to see SQL in the service layer, would it make sense to move it to models?

It is also the same for the all transaction but using the ORM.
I agree with you but I would try first to migrate the query to the ORM and check the performance before do a refactor for this.

gjeanmart added 3 commits July 9, 2025 10:57

Merge branch 'main' into feat/export

7257142

remove unecessary tearDown

51d3c74

gjeanmart self-assigned this Jul 9, 2025

Merge branch 'main' into feat/export

aea798f

Uxio0 requested changes Jul 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

moisses89 added 8 commits July 16, 2025 12:38

Add incoming ERC transaction test

e157c1a

Add tests for module transactions

ae052ca

Add query for module transactions sending ether

5df615e

Add tests for moduletransactions sending ether

Add ERC721 tests

267b803

Use Django pagination

204abe3

Fix date validator

ae8a43e

Refactor get_export_transactions

60dcdea

Add test for no transfer transactions

bfa7a7d

moisses89 reviewed Jul 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

Rewrite count query

d9902f0

moisses89 reviewed Jul 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

Fix pagination issue

ac088f7

moisses89 marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 10:40

moisses89 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2025 10:40

moisses89 requested a review from Uxio0 July 17, 2025 10:40

moisses89 self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025

Merge branch 'main' into feat/export

11868b7

moisses89 changed the title ~~[DRAFT] [OCX-87] Feat/Export~~ [OCX-87] Feat/Export Jul 17, 2025

falvaradorodriguez reviewed Jul 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

moisses89 added 4 commits July 17, 2025 16:48

Fix camelCase serializer

a65fdb4

Refactor to V1

768b05a

Merge branch 'main' into feat/export

39d51ec

Fix typo

151bf44

falvaradorodriguez approved these changes Jul 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

Uxio0 approved these changes Jul 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

falvaradorodriguez merged commit 3292f1a into main Jul 21, 2025
8 checks passed

falvaradorodriguez deleted the feat/export branch July 21, 2025 14:14

github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 21, 2025

[OCX-87] Feat/Export #2569

[OCX-87] Feat/Export #2569

Uh oh!

Conversation

gjeanmart commented Jul 9, 2025 • edited by moisses89 Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Make sure these boxes are checked! 📦✅

What was wrong? 👾

How was it fixed? 🎯

Summary

What This PR Does

Why This Change Is Needed

Implementation Details

New SQL Query Features

API Design

Data Structure

Files Changed

Testing

How to Test

Technical Notes

Breaking Changes

Migration Required

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

moisses89 Jul 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

moisses89 Jul 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

gjeanmart commented Jul 9, 2025 •

edited by moisses89

Loading

moisses89 Jul 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

moisses89 Jul 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading